Welcome to our World War Three build-up blog, where you will find insights that few others (if any) are providing at this time.
Whereas this subject has been very deliberately brought to the attention of the people in other European nations through governmental efforts,
especially in Poland, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Germany, it has been largely glossed over by the media in the UK and
Ireland, where we have only been drip-fed with snippets of news about government preparations and the laying of the groundwork (in the UK) for
near-term conscription.
Nevertheless, retired generals have been making public statements to raise the alarm and this has been helped by the threats of US President Donald Trump
to forsake NATO.
These threats are most definitely not to be taken seriously, bur rather are to be interpreted - just like his threats to annex Greenland - as "shock
therapy" designed to build narratives and public consent in Europe for massive pre-war rearmament and mobilisation; the very fact that he is being so
bellicose about it is a major red flag signalling that the West's establishments know that war is coming and have already committed to it, just as
Russia and China have.
And this is more than abundantly clear when one looks deeper into what is going on behind the scenes in the UK and France, where the health services
have been instructed to prepare for mass casualty inflows from eastern Europe and to establish protocols enabling smoother coordination with the
armed forces (see our article,
Critical Assessment of the National Security Strategy
for more details on this).
But the foregoing is perhaps academic for anyone who has been paying attention and performing prudent due diligence in recent years, in which case,
it's a matter of if you know, you know.
Alarmed at seeing mainstream media articles purporting to show "top ten nuclear targets in the UK"?
Such materials are lightweight fluff compared to this, which covers:
Fatalism about the survivability of nuclear war is rampant, as are artefacts of Cold War anti-bomb propaganda, including nuclear winter theory.
This article seeks to redress some commonly held, but utterly false, notions about nuclear war and highlights that it is survivable and that other
nations are proceeding on the basis that it is.
Myths refuted:
Nation states (in both the East and West) are, unlike the UK, engaged in frantic nuclear war bunkering measures.
At the same time, millionaires and billionaires are feverishing digging in and making their own preparations.
Northern Ireland has, in our assessment, some of the best retreat geography in all of the UK with respect to minimising the effects of radioactive
fallout during the coming nuclear war that all the major governments of the world are now scrambling to prepare for.
It also has other key attributes that make it an ideal locale to ride out the intervening storms.
Key takeaways:
Western conservatives have been the target of arguably the most sophisticated psychological warfare operation known to mankind in the modern age,
resulting in a hagiographic impression of Russian President-in-Perpetuity, Vladimir V. Putin.
Tragically, this has blind-sided them not just to a mortal enemy (beyond simply our own rulers), but to
how to interpret Russian moves on the geopolitical stage.
Key points:
Many western commentators believe that Russia sees Ukraine as an end in itself and that there is accordingly scope for a negotiated settlement.
Unfortunately, they are guilty of the same kind of near-sightedness that Neville Chamberlain's name shall forever be besmirched with, for Russia
(like China) is on an irreversible path to an all-out nuclear war with the West.
Just as bad, the West is also on the warpath.
Key points:
The UK is a target-rich environment in the context of nuclear war with Russia, but that point notwithstanding, there are some areas in it
that are far better suited to lying low in than most of the country.
Key points:
Ireland is sometimes spoken of by careless article-writers in the mainstream media as a utopia, along with New Zealand, in which nuclear war could be
safely sat out.
However, that is grossly naive.
Key points:
Russia is quietly positioning itself to broker peace in the Middle East and appears to be just waiting for America to make a major startegic misstep first.
A cynical but objective assessment of the UK's National Security Strategy 2025 (NSS 2025), highlighting the British government's
detachment from the public sentiment, its disregard for civil defence planning (shelters for the public) and its commitment to progressively transitioning the UK from a
peace-time state to a war-footing.